[13180] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: The Pure Crypto Project's Hash Function
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralf Senderek)
Sun May 4 09:52:24 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 08:37:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0305032009490.2736-100000@smtp.datapower.com>
On Sat, 3 May 2003, Rich Salz wrote:
> Users are not capabable of evaluating cryptography.
Don't blame the users! It's the complexity problem, I try to tackle it.
> Very simple: known to be cryptographically secure. SHA-1 is good. Your
> invention is bad.
So everything new must be bad, because it isn't "known to be .. secure"?
> End of discussion (from me).
I can live with that.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
* Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de> http://senderek.de * What is privacy *
* Sandstr. 60 D-41849 Wassenberg +49 2432-3960 * without *
* PGP: AB 2C 85 AB DB D3 10 E7 CD A4 F8 AC 52 FC A9 ED * Pure Crypto? *
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
