[147764] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Mail Lists In the Post-Snowden Era
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (grarpamp)
Sun Oct 20 13:30:19 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <B8751F45-4115-45A5-A6EA-F13AFA3681CE@lrw.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:24:21 -0400
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: "cryptography@metzdowd.com List" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@al-qaeda.net
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Jerry Leichter <leichter@lrw.com> wrote:
> He raised the questions of whether we could make a Prism-proof Internet.
>
> That's a big problem, and we've been debating small pieces of it ever since. I'd like to suggest a smaller problem, just as a kind of rallying point.
>
> So ... imagine we don't like that. How could this list be constituted in a "secure" way?
You mention 'participant = adversaries', 'email', 'anonymity', 'open list'...
Afaik, the only thing that would incorporate those rather easily today
is setting up postfix, dovecot and mailman on a hidden service. It's all
been done before. Run the software, make a nym@ account, you're done.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
