[16489] in APO-L
Re: Bylaws
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carrie Heller)
Thu Mar 27 18:50:44 1997
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 18:49:31 -0500
Reply-To: Carrie Heller <cah7287@GARNET.ACNS.FSU.EDU>
From: Carrie Heller <cah7287@GARNET.ACNS.FSU.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
>Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 18:26:23 -0500
>Reply-To: Solstice <highway@VNI.NET>
>Sender: Alpha Phi Omega Discussion List <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
>From: Solstice <highway@VNI.NET>
>Subject: Re: Bylaws
>To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
>
>On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Erika Kleppinger wrote:
>
>> associate brother. We were thinking about making this statement stronger by
>> saying that they will become an associate brother. We also wanted to put
>> some consequence to not attending meetings, but we are not sure how to word
>> it and how strict of a statement to use.
>
>Ours state that if a active brother does not pay for active dues, complete
>25 hours by elections or miss more than 2 (or 3, can't remember) chapter
>meetings, the brother will automatically be bumped to associate status.
>
>
>
my chapter, Iota Rho, only requires a brother to complete 2 projects or
serve on a standing comittee, or they will go inactive. If a brother misses
3 chapters s/he will go inactive unless they write a explanation to exec.
This seems really easy in comparison
Carrie Heller
Iota Rho, Florida State University
cah7287@garnet.acns.fsu.edu
