[16779] in APO-L
Re: ALCHOHOL POLICY
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lyn Belzer)
Wed Apr 30 12:10:30 1997
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 11:08:58 -0600
Reply-To: Lynore_Belzer@BAYLOR.EDU
From: Lyn Belzer <Lynore_Belzer@BAYLOR.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <01IIAI8ZAK3M8X5EDK@baylor.edu>
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997 19:01:16 -0700 (PDT) section69@HOTMAIL.COM (Bill Butler)
wrote:
>However, I believe that alcohol at projects should be discouraged, because the
>purpose is service oriented and there would be more potential for "ovelooking"
>the policy without some sort of supervisory presence.
Hmmm. I'd go even further than that. In my opinion (and I will admit that this
has been greatly influenced by Rick Bojko, former Section 89 Chair and all
around spiffy-kinda-guy) the policy should be no alcohol. Period. What does
alcohol have to do with Service? And who says you can't have a blast at a
Fellowship with no alcohol present? We won't even get into alcohol and
Leadership.
A blanket policy like this just saves a lot of trouble, legal and otherwise.
These days, most students aren't turning 21 until their senior year in college.
There is no earthly reason alcohol MUST be present at anything.
So, in a nutshell, my opinion of the alcohol policy is if it's APO sponsored or
run, no alcohol.
Just my $0.62...(gotta keep up with inflation, you know...:)
In LF&S,
Angel
