[17679] in APO-L
Re: all-male chapters
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MINDI ANN SEIDEL)
Thu Nov 20 14:24:07 1997
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:22:40 -0500
Reply-To: MINDI ANN SEIDEL <mas700g@MAIL.ODU.EDU>
From: MINDI ANN SEIDEL <mas700g@MAIL.ODU.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199711201805.NAA16029@tahiti.cc.odu.edu>
This may be a personal pet peeve, byt WE are ALPHA PHI OMEGA, you are in a
CHAPTER of APO, I am in a CHAPTER of APO
We are part of a whole, adn represent both the PART and the WHOLE
Mindi
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, dolphin wrote:
> i knew that someone would eventually pick this apart, i realize that we
> are coed nationally, when i said about never being in a coed fraternity i
> was looking at it from the chapter standpoint. my chapter, my fraternity
> is not coed. something like kappa psi (pharmacy), mu phi epsilon
> (music), kappa delta epsilon (education), delta sigma pi and phi chi
> theta (business) all have coed chapters on our campus. i therefore
> consider them to be coed and since my chapter is not coed, then i do not
> consider myself to be a member of a coed fraternity.
>
> john s.
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, MINDI ANN SEIDEL wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the ONLY thing I will say on all-male issue
> >
> > John - YOU ARE IN A CO-ED FRATERNITY.
> >
> > I have no problem with chapters being all-male, all-female, all gay,
> > all-straight, all-black, all-white, all-Whatever - so long as we do our
> > best to uphold the principles of Alpha Phi Omega
> >
> >
> >
> > Mindi
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, dolphin wrote:
> >
> > > i have never been in a coed fraternity, but my opinion of why i think all
> > > male is better. i feel that by being all male, we are a closer knit
> > > group.
> > >
> >
> >
>
