[9537] in APO-L
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster)
Fri Sep 30 17:15:44 1994
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 16:12:24 -0500
Reply-To: Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
From: Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
id m0qqpH1-00024jC; Fri, 30 Sep 94 17:13 EDT
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 17:13:47 -29900
From: "M. Hale" <mh5260@cutter.ship.edu>
Subject: Re: All-male chapters
To: apo-l%purccvm.bitnet@uga.cc.uga.edu
In-Reply-To: <01HHQ4BHP3ZM001K6O@ARK.SHIP.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9409301700.A29368-0100000@cutter.ship.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> QUESTION: Of the all-male chapters out there, WHY do you choose
> to stay all-male (aside from the "it's tradition" answer)?
>
Well, I am a member of Lambda Lambda which has been all-male as long as
I've been in (2 years, I guess). I know the idea of going co-ed has been
kicked around, but it was rejected. Why? Here at Ship, we have a
sorority by the name of Gamma Sigma Sigma. We think that if APO went
co-ed, we would suck up (pardon the pun) all of their membership, hence
destroying a fellow service organization, which we don't want to do. I
think that just about sums up our reasons.
Mike.
LL, Ship
