[9573] in APO-L
Re: Gamma Sig vs APO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave BeachBum Bujak)
Mon Oct 3 08:37:42 1994
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 08:39:56 -0400
Reply-To: Dave BeachBum Bujak <dave@DB.ERAU.EDU>
From: Dave BeachBum Bujak <dave@DB.ERAU.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <m0qreP8-0007vqC@db.erau.edu>
> shad cook wrote:
> > ***That is our main reason here at U OF MN-Duluth as well. We brought up
> > the subject with GSS and the majority said they would quit GSS and become
> > members of APO. Is that fair to GSS, no. That takes away from an
> > organization that rivals us in commitment of service not to mention
> > hours. we each put in over 1200 hours a quarter. We don't want to see
> > it decline.
>
> I have a question then. I am not one for undermining other service
> organizations HOWEVER why should our decisions be dependent on the
> weakness of another organization?
I have found that most of the people that have joined out interest group
had seriously considered joining one fo the other fraternities/sororities,
however they heard about us before their signed anything. I have a
feeling that if we had advertised our interest group during RUSH weeks, we
would have "taken" more people from the other fraternities. Now, RUSH is
over and we will go public with our group in a week or so. I expect a
good number of people to join. I'm just curious how many will not join
because they joined another fraternity already, despite the fact they can
still technically join.
