[9576] in APO-L
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster)
Mon Oct 3 09:50:30 1994
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 08:45:14 -0500
Reply-To: Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
From: Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
id m0qrnis-00023KC; Mon, 3 Oct 94 09:46 EDT
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 09:46:32 -29900
From: "M. Hale" <mh5260@cutter.ship.edu>
Subject: Gamma Sig
To: apo-l@PURCCVM
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9410030957.A6842-0100000@cutter.ship.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To add to the APO vs. GSS discussion:
I cannot say whether or not there are any internal weaknesses within the
Gamma Sig system, but I do think that APO is much better known than they
are. For that reason (at least here at Ship), many females come to us
(since there are co-ed chapters) and we refer them to Gamma Sig. I'm not
saying that they do not get pledges by themselves, they do. I am saying
that in my opinion, I think that APO better known and for the typical
freshman they are going the go to the group they have heard of and if our
chapter was co-ed, I suspect they would come to us. That would lead to a
decrease in the membership of GSS.
This is just my theory and opinion.....
Mike
