[9640] in APO-L
Re: signing off.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (EDK@LASPAU.MHS.HARVARD.EDU)
Tue Oct 4 23:11:33 1994
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 23:05:18 -0400
Reply-To: EDK@LASPAU.MHS.HARVARD.EDU
From: EDK@LASPAU.MHS.HARVARD.EDU
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <C0332260562C8CD1*@SMF>
>due to the constant flow of mail on the same subject, I am going to be
>signing off for a while until things calm down a little. I have a very
>busy school schedule which unfortunately does not allow for excess mail
>that I don't read.
I might as well send this to everyone, to signoff apo-l, send the
message:
signoff apo-l
to:
listserv@vm.cc.purdue.edu or listserv@purccvm (BITNET sites only)
I've noticed a lot of signoffs lately which are probably due to the
current high volume. May I suggest one thing in the current toast song
debate, if you've posted several messages on the subject already, try to
limit yourself to posting only things that are new and different.
Repeating the same arguements doesn't further the discussion.
Y.I.S.
Ellen c.c. Kranzer
APO-L Administrator
ekranzer@harvard.edu
