[9670] in APO-L
Re: Sub/Ob-jective Pledge Standards...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rick Nyman)
Thu Oct 6 08:17:28 1994
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 1994 08:00:49 EST5EDT
Reply-To: enyman@vt.edu
From: Rick Nyman <enyman@vt.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
Our sectional membership & extension chair (not the current one) sent us a
really rude letter last year about the ability to vote out pledges who
have met stated requirements. Note this direct quote from bylaws:
Part XI. Exemplify the Cardinal Principals of Alpha Phi Omega to the
satisfaction of the Chapter.
He included quotes from national bylaws with ^^^^^ emphasis under some
parts. In our return letter, we sent back the exact same quote, but moved
the emphasis. We didn't hear from him again.
> > And the last answer was that it was against National Policy (re:
> >National Pledging Standards) to have anything but objective standards.
>
> Not by my interpretation of 19. Possibly by someone's interpretation,
> but I would like the chance to convince them otherwise.
If we still had the same person as chair, I'd send you the address, but
we've got a new person, so it's a non-issue.
--
Rick Nyman
enyman@vt.edu
Mechanical Engineering
Virginia Tech
