[16123] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Loosen embedded dust, dirt and allergens in your carpet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Soniclean)
Fri Jun 14 22:04:52 2013
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:04:30 -0700
From: "Soniclean" <Soniclean@symtxegan.net>
To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.328.4175.1371261870
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cleans 94% better than Dyson
http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF21.php
Unsub- http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF22.html
WASHINGTON Senior Pentagon leaders are taking another look at sharply reducing
the number of unpaid furlough days that department civilians will have to
take in the coming months, suggesting they may be able to cut
the number from 14 to as few as seven, defense officials said
Thursday.If the number is reduced, it would be the second time the
Pentagon has cut the number of furlough days. It had initially been
set at 22 days.The officials say no decision has been made and
that they are not ruling out efforts to drop the furloughs entirely.
The renewed talks come as Navy leaders continue to push for eliminating
required furloughs for Navy civilians. The officials spoke on condition
of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the issue publicly.Defense
officials are reviewing a range of options to determine how many furlough
days they can cut, because recent legislation gives the Pentagon more flexibility
in how it allocates the required spending cuts for this year. So
far, Pentagon leaders have insisted that civilians across all the military
services be treated equally, suggesting it would be unfair for workers in
one service to face more unpaid days off that those in another
service.Others, including members of Congress, have argued that if there
is enough money in an account to pay the civilians, the department
should do all it can to allow them to work. The fairness
debate has also cut across federal agencies, with some def
Social Security Administration contacted the Highway Patrol in
November 2011 seeking a list of Missouri's concealed gun permit holders
for a probe into whether people were fraudulently claiming mental illnesses
to get disability benefits. People with mental illnesses are not supposed
to be issued concealed gun permits, so their inclusion on the state's
list could indicate they either weren't mentally ill or shouldn't have a
concealed gun, Replogle said.He said the patrol obtained the concealed gun
permit list and provided it on a disc, but the federal investigator
was unable to read it and destroyed it. This January, the same
investigator made the same request and the patrol again obtained and shared
a computer disc containing information about 163,247 people with concealed
gun permits. But Replogle said the federal investigator again was unable
to read the data and again destroyed the disc.Had he been consulted
first, Replogle said he would have provided information only on specific
people that the Social Security Administration was investigating, not the
entire list.The House on Thursday passed legislation intended to stop the
Revenue Department from making electronic copies of concealed gun permit
documents. The bill also would require the department to destroy those documents
that already have been collected.
------=Part.328.4175.1371261870
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<body>
<div style="font:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<table width="418" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF1.php"><H3>Cleans 94% better than Dyson</a></H3></strong>
<td align="center" valign="top" style="font-size:12px;">
<a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF2.php">Clean The Unseen</a> With The Power Of <a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF3.php">Soniclean</a><br><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF4.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img09820243.jpg" width="418" height="97" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF5.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img19820243.jpg" width="418" height="290" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF6.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img29820243.jpg" width="418" height="290" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF7.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img39820243.jpg" width="418" height="170" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF8.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img49820243.jpg" width="418" height="257" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF9.php"><img src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img59820243.jpg" width="418" height="148" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<center><td width="300" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; color: #666; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/883/1806.11tt65731829AAF10.html">Update Preferences</a><br><Br>6550 N. Federal Hwy Suite 240 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308</td>
</div>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.symtxegan.net/u/1271/883/1806/11/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.symtxegan.net/1271/98/202/65731829/883.1806/img69820243.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> it "unclassified," which led to the confusion.A U.S. official in
Seoul said Friday it is "premature" to say North Korea has developed
the expertise to make a nuclear weapon small enough to put on
a ballistic missile."It is a very difficult task," the official told Fox
News. "They haven't been able to put everything together."The official also
says there is no indication a North Korea missile launch is imminent,
saying officials "have not seen activity" that would show that a launch
will happen soon, or that the country is planning a large scale
attack."There has been no indication of massive troop movements or anything
to back up the rhetoric going on," the official said.Meanwhile, Kerry's
trip to South Korea comes in the midst of bellicose threats from
the unpredictable communist regime in the North.Kerry and his South Korean
counterpart said in a joint press conference Friday that North Korea will
gain nothing by threatening tests of its missile or nuclear programs.Kerry
said the U.S. and its Asian ally won't accept the North as
a nuclear power, calling the country's rhetoric "unacceptable."South Korean
Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se called Pyongyang's threats a "grave provocation"
to the entire international community.Since the beginning of March, the
Navy has moved two missile defense ships closer to the coast of
the Korean peninsula, in part to protect against a potential missile launch
aimed at Guam, a U.S. territory in the Pacifi
he kinds of nuclear capabilities referenced in the passage," Pentagon spokesman
George Little said. Clapper echoed the assessment.Meanwhile, North Korea
was leveling new threats Friday. According to South Korea's Yonhap News
Agency, the regime warned that Tokyo would, in the event of a
war, be the first target "if it continues to maintain its hostile
posture." North Korea was apparently threatening Japan because it vowed
to destroy any missile heading toward the country.Separately, South Korean
President Park Geun-hye reportedly said she's open to working with the North
to resolve the standoff if the regime ends its provocative behavior.The
dispute over the North's nuclear capability started with the Capitol Hill
hearing Thursday. At the hearing, Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., read aloud
what he said was an unclassified paragraph from a secret Defense Intelligence
Agency report that was supplied to some members of Congress.He said, reading
from the report: "DIA assesses with moderate confidence the North currently
has nuclear weapons capable of delivering by ballistic missiles, however
the reliability will be low.''The reading seemed to take Gen. Martin Dempsey,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, by surprise, who said he
hadn't seen the report and declined to answer questions about it.Pentagon
officials told Fox News that the memo he read from was in
fact classified. However, someone at the Defense Intelligence Agency mistakenly
marked
</p>
</html>
------=Part.328.4175.1371261870--
