[16364] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Cut your Mortgage Bill in HALF! Lock in the lowest rates in DECADES! Sign up below and Save!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mortgage Experts)
Fri Jun 21 00:57:13 2013

To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:56:50 -0700
From: "Mortgage Experts" <MortgageExperts@macautlascian.net>

------=Part.972.6983.1371790610
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Cut Your Mortgage Bill in HALF! Lock in the lowest rates in DECADES! Sign up below and Save!

http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/142/270.10tt65731829AAF7.php









Unsub - http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/142/270.10tt65731829AAF8.html


848 N. Rainbow Blvd #1939 - Las Vegas,NV,89107

















 South Korea and Japan against these threats. And we 
will defend ourselves," he said.Speaking beside Kerry, South Korea's Yun 
called for more United Nations action against Pyongyang if it commits another 
provocation.He refused to comment specifically on the U.S. intelligence 
report, saying only that the North has "high nuclear and missile capabilities" 
but that it is still some time away from a nuclear bomb 
that is "small, light and diversified."Kerry offered strong words of solidarity 
for South Korea, and praised South Korea President Park Geun-hyes "bright 
vision" of a prosperous and reunified Korean Peninsula without nuclear weapons. 
By contrast, he said North Korea's Kim, has a choice to make 
between provocation and returning to talks to de-escalate tension and lead 
to the end of its nuclear programBoth Yun and Kerry kept the 
door open for future negotiations with Pyongyang.But both seemed to suggest 
that they were unlikely in light of the North's increasingly bombastic threats, 
including nuclear strikes on the United States. Most experts say those are 
unfeasible based on the North's current capacity and would never be explored 
seriously because the U.S. response would be overwhelming against a regime 
focused primarily on survival.Kerry said any talks with North Korea have 
to lead toward denuclearization.They have to be really serious," Kerry said. 
"No one is going to talk for the sake of talking and 
no one is going to play this roun
 After successful recent ballistic and nuclear bomb tests, North Korea has 
threatened the United States with nuclear strikes. This week, the Pyongyang 
regime stated that the Korean Peninsula is headed for thermo-nuclear war, 
told foreign diplomats to leave North Korea and advised foreigners to leave 
South Korea. Today, it has two medium range Musudan-1 missiles prepared 
for immediate launch from its east coast.Its decision time on North Korea.What 
should the U.S. do if, as expected, North Korea goes ahead and 
launches the two Musudan-1 missiles? Fortunately, our Aegis Combat System 
has the ability to calculate their trajectory within seconds. If the Musudan-1 
missiles are heading for open water, we should let them fly, but 
be sure to collect the debris for analysis. Remember, Kim Jong Uns 
game is to provoke the United States (and Japan and South Korea) 
into military action. We should not play into his hands if not 
necessary.If, on the other hand, Aegis calculates the trajectory as headed 
for land (such as Guam, Japan, Okinawa, or South Korea), we need 
to be prepared to not only take out those missiles with missile 
interceptors, but also immediately take out their missile launchers with 
Tomahawks. At that point, we should also take out the eight Musudan 
missiles the North Koreans are holding in reserve in tunnels along their 
Eastern coastline.Earlier this week, Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) detected 
that North Korea had begun to deploy

------=Part.972.6983.1371790610
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<title></title>

<strong><center><a href="http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/142/270.10tt65731829AAF1.php"><H3>Cut Your Mortgage Bill in HALF! Lock in the lowest rates in DECADES! Sign up below and Save!</a></H3></strong>
</head>
<body>
<a href="http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/142/270.10tt65731829AAF1.php"><img src="http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/65731829/142.270/img0273343.jpg" alt="" title="loanrateexperts" width="590" height="790" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-119" /></a><br />
<p><a href="http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/142/270.10tt65731829AAF3.html">Update Preferences</a><br /><br>
848 N. Rainbow Blvd #1939 - Las Vegas,NV,89107</p>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
 <a href="http://www.macautlascian.net/u/1365/142/270/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.macautlascian.net/1365/27/33/65731829/142.270/img2273343.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> The Internal Revenue Service believes it doesnt need permission to root 
through emails, texts or other forms of electronic correspondence, according 
to recently released internal agency documents.The documents, which were 
obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by the American Civil 
Liberties Union, reveal that tax department agents have been operating under 
the assumption that they can bypass warrants. The ACLU claims this would 
in turn violate the Fourth Amendment.According to a 2009 IRS employee handbook, 
though, the tax agency said the Fourth Amendment does not protect emails 
because Internet users dont have a reasonable expectation of privacy in 
such communications.A lawyer for the agency reiterated the policy in 2010. 
And the current online version of the IRS manual says that no 
warrant is required for emails that are stored by an Internet storage 
provider for more than 180 days."This is an affront not only to 
our system of checks and balances, but also to our fundamental right 
to privacy," Colorado Democratic Sen. Mark Udall said in a statement Thursday, 
adding that he wants Congress to overhaul the Electronic Communications 
Privacy Act.In the meantime, I urge the IRS to reconsider its overreach, 
he said.The ECPA is the federal law that governs law enforcement access 
to emails, and draws on what some say is an outdated distinction 
between email stored on a server for 180 days or less and 
email that has been opened.O
 ed by the Senate Judiciary 
Committee, which has scheduled a hearing for next Wednesday and will likely 
begin to amend and vote on the bill the week of May 
6. From there, the bill would move to the Senate floor.Both in 
committee and on the floor, the bill could change in unpredictable ways 
as senators try to amend it from the left and the right. 
The Gang of Eight -- Schumer, Durbin, and Sens. John McCain and 
Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Robert 
Menendez, D-N.J., and Michael Bennet, D-Colo. -- have discussed banding 
together to defeat amendments that could significantly alter the legislation.Even 
more uncertain, though, is the conservative-led House, where a bipartisan 
group is also crafting an immigration bill, though timing of its release 
is uncertain. Many conservatives in the House remain opposed to citizenship 
for immigrants who have been living in the U.S. illegally.In addition to 
the new details on criteria for future citizens, other significant elements 
of the Senate legislation are also known, through comments from senators 
or aides, leaks or statements by outside groups.The bill is expected to 
provide a 13-year path to citizenship for people living here illegally who 
qualify, but only after a new southern border security plan is in 
place, employers have adopted mandatory electronic verification of their 
workers' legal status and a new electronic entry-exit system is operating 
at airports and
</p>
</html>

------=Part.972.6983.1371790610--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post