[17008] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Lantern made of durable metal construction with shatterproof dome

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Olde Brooklyn Lantern Review)
Mon Jul 8 17:03:49 2013

To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
From: "Olde Brooklyn Lantern Review" <OldeBrooklynLanternReview@seqqlayfrim.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:03:48 -0700
Reply-To: <bounce-65731829@seqqlayfrim.net>

------=Part.962.8276.1373317428
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lantern with 9 LED bulbs shines for up to 100,000 hours

http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF23.php







Unsub- http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF12.html












on Dzhokhar under the "public safety 
exception" invoked by the Justice Department.Two officials with knowledge 
of the FBI briefing on Capitol Hill said the FBI was against 
stopping the investigators' questioning and was stunned that the judge, 
Justice Department prosecutors and public defenders showed up, feeling valuable 
intelligence may have been sacrificed as a result.The FBI had been questioning 
Tsarnaev for 16 hours before the judge called a start to the 
court proceeding, officials familiar with the Capitol Hill briefing told 
Fox News. Moreover, the FBI informed lawmakers that the suspect had been 
providing valuable intelligence, but stopped talking once the magistrate 
judge read him his rights.The exact timeline is unclear. A transcript of 
the court proceeding shows Bowler asking a doctor if Tsarnaev was "alert.""You 
can rouse him," she says in the transcript."How are you feeling? Are 
you able to answer some questions?" the doctor asks Tsarnaev, who nods.Although 
Bowler advised Tsarnaev, an ethnic Chechen and U.S. citizen, of his Miranda 
rights, it remains to be seen whether anything he told investigators before 
Bowler arrived can be admitted as evidence against him -- or whether 
such interrogations would even be needed to convict him, given the amount 
of other evidence referenced in the criminal complaint signed by FBI Special 
Agent Daniel Genck.Some Republican lawmakers have criticized the Obama administration 
for deciding again
at 
contains a path to citizenship, still viewed by some as amnesty. Instead 
they prefer to coalesce around consensus issues like border security, temporary 
workers and workplace enforcement.But if the Senate's comprehensive approach 
faces obstacles in the House, the House's piecemeal approach won't fly in 
the Senate.Two of the lead authors of the Senate bill, Sens. Chuck 
Schumer, D-N.Y., and John McCain, R-Ariz., rejected the piece-by-piece approach 
at a breakfast meeting with reporters Thursday hosted by the Christian Science 
Monitor. Schumer and McCain said that any time an immigration issue is 
advanced individually, even something widely supported like visas for high-tech 
workers or a citizenship path for those brought as children, lawmakers and 
interest groups start pushing for other issues to get dealt with at 
the same time."What we have found is, ironically, it may be a 
little counterintuitive, that the best way to pass immigration legislation 
is actually a comprehensive bill, because that can achieve more balance 
and everybody can get much but not all of what they want," 
Schumer said. "And so I think the idea of doing separate bills 
is just not going to work. It's not worked in the past, 
and it's not going to work in the future."The House has always 
loomed as the toughest barrier to passage of immigration legislation, partly 
because many rank-and-file House Republicans don't feel a political imperative 
to act. Some GOP House me

------=Part.962.8276.1373317428
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF13.php"><H3>Lantern with 9 LED bulbs shines for up to 100,000 hours</a></H3></strong>
<head>
<title>Olde Brooklyn Lantern &mdash; The Vintage Style Lantern With New LED Technology</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
	<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
		<a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF13.php">Olde Brooklyn Lantern &mdash; The Vintage Style Lantern With New LED Technology</a></td>
	</td>
</tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF13.php"><img src="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/65731829/1061.2268/img012224143.jpg" alt="Olde Brooklyn Lantern &mdash; The Vintage Style Lantern With New LED Technology" width="320" height="510" border="0"></a></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td align="center">
	<a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF13.php"><img src="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/65731829/1061.2268/img112224143.gif" border="0"></a>
 
  	<a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/1061/2268.10tt65731829AAF13.php"><img src="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/65731829/1061.2268/img212224143.gif" border="0"></a></td>
  </tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/u/1580/1061/2268/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.seqqlayfrim.net/1580/122/241/65731829/1061.2268/img312224143.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">nce for lesbians than 
gay men, and that gay men are significantly more likely to be 
targets of violence.That research also has found that it's often straight 
men who have the most difficult time with homosexuality   and 
particularly gay men    says researcher Gregory Herek."Men are raised 
to think they have to prove their masculinity, and one big part 
about being masculine is being heterosexual. So we see that harassment, 
jokes, negative statements and violence are often ways that even younger 
men try to prove their heterosexuality," says Herek, a psychologist at the 
University of California, Davis, who has, for years, studied this phenomenon 
and how it plays out in the gay community.That is not, of 
course, to downplay the harassment lesbians face. It can be just as 
ugly.But it's not as frequent, Herek and others have found, especially in 
adulthood. It's also not uncommon for lesbians to encounter straight men 
who have a fascination with them."The men hit on me. The women 
hit on me. But I never feel like I'm in any immediate 
danger," says Sarah Toce, the 29-year-old editor of The Seattle Lesbian, 
a daily online news magazine. "If I were a gay man, I 
might    and if it's like this in Seattle, can 
you imagine what it is like in less-accepting parts of middle America?"One 
of Herek's studies found that, overall, 38 percent of gay men said 
that, in adulthood, they'd been victims of vandalism, theft or violence 
   hit, beaten or sexually 
 Shown here are Federal Premium hollow point bullets.APRepublican Rep. Jason 
Chaffetz said Thursday that the Department of Homeland Security is using 
roughly 1,000 rounds of ammunition more per person than the U.S. Army, 
as he and other lawmakers sharply questioned DHS officials on their "massive" 
bullet buys."It is entirely ... inexplicable why the Department of Homeland 
Security needs so much ammunition," Chaffetz, R-Utah, said at a hearing.The 
hearing itself was unusual, as questions about the department's ammunition 
purchases until recently had bubbled largely under the radar -- on blogs 
and in the occasional news article. But as the Department of Homeland 
Security found itself publicly defending the purchases, lawmakers gradually 
showed more interest in the issue.Democratic Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., 
at the opening of the hearing, ridiculed the concerns as "conspiracy theories" 
which have "no place" in the committee room.But Republicans said the purchases 
raise "serious" questions about waste and accountability.Chaffetz, who chairs 
one of the House oversight subcommittees holding the hearing Thursday, revealed 
that the department currently has more than 260 million rounds in stock. 
He said the department bought more than 103 million rounds in 2012 
and used 116 million that same year -- among roughly 70,000 agents.Comparing 
that with the small-arms purchases procured by the U.S. Army, he said 
the DHS is churning through between 1,300 
</p>
</html>

------=Part.962.8276.1373317428--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post