[17092] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Turn 60 minutes into $379?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michelle Withrow)
Wed Jul 10 11:12:39 2013
To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
From: "Michelle Withrow" <MichelleWithrow@mtddargahethics.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:12:38 -0700
------=Part.926.4678.1373469158
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This local mom *never* thought she’d make
$7,487 in one month working from home…
That's right... She went from unemployed to making
$379+ a day on the internet and now she shared
her incredible story with us
I’ve said enough, just read this post right NOW, okay?
Here’s the link:
http://www.mtddargahethics.net/1610/91/194/839/1718.10tt65731829AAF5.php
==> Read The Full Post Now - Click Here
-WAH Team
_______________________________________________
If you don't want any more correspondance about this offer visit here http://www.mtddargahethics.net/1610/91/194/839/1718.10tt65731829AAF6.html or write to:
BR LLC. WAHU, PO BOX 441206, Houston, TX 77244-1206
ather the result of the fog of war, or something like
it. An inquest would be conducted. The bottom of this would be
gotten to.The slow walk was on.Romney subsequently shied from the subject.
The one time he made mention of the attack in a debate
with Obama, the president caught him on a technicality and moderator Candy
Crowley of CNN helped to humiliate the former Massachusetts governor.The
press, mostly either cowed or uninterested on the subject, let the issue
drop too. Obama's strategy was successful. Political disaster was averted.
Cue the confetti.But having been re-elected, the election strategy re: Benghazi
is causing something of a hangover for the president.Now that we have
had the first large-scale terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, public
anxiety about Islamists and terrorism is way up. With that backdrop, Republicans
are re-opening the inquest into the Benghazi attacks. This time the questions
aren't so much about non-existent riots or why Americans in an Islamist
country weren't on higher alert.This time it's about allegations of a cover-up.
Did Obama officials muzzle critics in service of the president's re-election
goal? Was the inquest full and fair? What did the president know,
and when did he know it?Given it all to do over again,
Obama likely would repeat his pre-election approach to Benghazi: denounce
critics, go slow and minimize any broader significance of the attack. After
all, he did win a second term.But
The White House budget office is recalculating how to apply automatic spending
cuts for a handful of agencies, freeing up almost $4 billion for
the Pentagon and another $1 billion or so for Homeland Security Department
and NASA.Capitol Hill aides familiar with the White House changes say the
administration has identified almost $5 billion in cuts that can be restored
under its reading of the arcane budget rules governing the across-the-board
cuts, known as sequestration. The calculations would restore $5 billion
of the scheduled $85 billion in automatic sequestration cuts.An administration
official confirmed the calculations Friday but declined to comment further
because the process is ongoing. The official and congressional aides spoke
on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the
changes publicly.The move comes amid increasing public pressure to find
ways to lessen the impact of sequestration. Federal agencies are warning
that the mandatory cuts could mean cutbacks in services. Last week, Congress
passed and President Obama signed legislation giving the Federal Aviation
Administration the ability to avoid furloughs that were causing flight delays
by tapping money in other accounts.The cuts officially began in March after
Congress and Obama could not reach an agreement on a broader budget
deal. The automatic cuts had been imposed under a hard-fought 2011 debt
and budget pact.The cuts have so far failed to live
------=Part.926.4678.1373469158
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<p>This local mom *never* thought she’d make<br />
$7,487 in one month working from home…</p>
<p>That's right... She went from unemployed to making<br />
$379+ a day on the internet and now she shared<br />
her incredible story with us</p>
<p>I’ve said enough, just read this post right NOW, okay?<br />
Here’s the link:</p>
<p>==> <a href="http://www.mtddargahethics.net/1610/91/194/839/1718.10tt65731829AAF1.php">Read The Full Post Now - Click Here</a></p>
<p>-WAH Team</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>
<p style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">_______________________________________________<br />
<br />
If you don't want any more correspondance about this offer visit <a href="http://www.mtddargahethics.net/1610/91/194/839/1718.10tt65731829AAF2.html">here</a> or write to:<br />
<span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">BR LLC. WAHU, PO BOX 441206, Houston, TX 77244-1206</span><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.mtddargahethics.net/u/1610/839/1718/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.mtddargahethics.net/1610/91/194/65731829/839.1718/img09119443.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects
all faiths.We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.
But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.
None."-- President Obama on Sept. 12, 2012 discussing the attack on the
U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, then said by the administration to have
been spurred by an Internet video deemed offensive to Islam.Elections are
clarifying things, though not necessarily for voters.Americans are still
puzzling over the significance and consequences of 2012's electoral embrace
of an unpopular status quo. Is dysfunction the new normal? Is sclerotic
malaise the best we can muster for a federal government?But for the
candidates and campaign teams in the midst of elections, they are marvelously
simplifying affairs. If you don't win, nothing else matters. Other considerations
must take a back seat, even if you are the incumbent president
of the most important nation on the planet.If one believes he or
she is in politics to do good, as almost all politicians do,
ignoble attainment of a victory is easily excused by the thought of
good deeds achieved once installed or retained in office.Today's birthday
boy, Nicolo Machiavelli, wrote that if a politician is successful, "the
means will always be considered honest." Or, as his modern intellectual
heir, Al Davis of the Oakland Raiders, put it: "Just win, baby."But
it is not always so.
on will face tough odds not only
in the GOP-controlled House but also in the Democratic-led Senate.The president
acknowledged there were some areas along the 2,000-mile border between the
U.S. and Mexico where security needs to be tightened. But he gently
chided Rubio and other Republicans for putting up obstacles that would derail
final legislation."I suspect that the final legislation will not contain
everything I want. It won't contain everything that Republican leaders want,
either," Obama said. He added that "what I'm not going to do
is to go along with something where we're looking for an excuse
not to do it as opposed to a way to do it."Despite
the intense interest in the immigration debate among Mexicans, Pena Nieto
carefully avoided injecting himself in the issue. While he commended the
U.S. for tackling the challenge, he said the congressional debate "is a
domestic affair."The new Mexican leader was purposely seeking to avoid the
perceived missteps of former Mexican President Vicente Fox, who irked conservatives
in the U.S. by lobbying for an immigration overhaul in 2001.Pena Nieto's
election brought Mexico's Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, back
to power after a decade on the sidelines. The security changes are
emblematic of the party's preference for centralized political and bureaucratic
control.The arrangement means all contact for U.S. law enforcement will
now go through a "single door," according to Mexico's fe
</p>
------=Part.926.4678.1373469158--
