[1922] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] New Card initiative
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dheera Venkatraman)
Mon Jul 3 12:44:51 2006
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:44:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dheera Venkatraman <dheera@mit.edu>
To: David Glasser <glasser@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1ea387f60607030933g7d46f86bs39c8262ac917aeda@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: ua-scatr@mit.edu, mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
agree... to reverse, ought there not to be some sort of petition, UA
action, etc.?
-dheera
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, David Glasser wrote:
> On 7/3/06, Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> wrote:
>> I am going to push Rich Berlin for a press release of some sort (which
>> they may already have prepared). Hopefully we can find out more in the
>> next few days.
>
> Why is this useful? It seems to me that once MIT has put out a press
> release saying they're going to do something stupid, they have even
> more of an excuse to not reverse themselves.
>
> --dave
>
>
> --
> David Glasser | glasser@mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
> _______________________________________________
> MIT-talk mailing list
> MIT-talk@mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
>
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
