[20746] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Tired of Dieting? Get a 100% Organic Cambodian Weight Loss Extract!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract)
Sat Oct 26 07:34:14 2013

Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:34:15 -0700
To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
From: "Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract" <PureGarciniaCambogiaExtract@oscmeungopcode.us>

------=Part.324.5122.1382787255
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

100% Organic Weight Loss - Pure Garcinia Extract!


http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF17.php


To Unsub - http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF10.html


PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426



















 Voters are divided over how the White House is handling the September 
11, 2012 attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed 
a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. On President Obamas role, however, 
voters are clear: he should have been more involved.A Fox News poll 
asked voters about their reaction to former Defense Secretary Leon Panettas 
testimony to Congress in February on the Benghazi attack. Panetta testified 
that after the initial 5:00 PM briefing with the president, he didnt 
hear from the President Obama or anyone at the White House again 
that night. CLICK TO VIEW THE FOX NEWS POLLWhile almost a third 
of voters (29 percent) think there was probably a good reason for 
the president not to be personally involved, most voters -- 61 percent 
-- say Obama should have been directly involved no matter what.Most Republicans 
(82 percent) and over half of independents (57 percent) feel the president 
should have been more engaged in responding to the assault. Among Democrats 
views are split: 43 percent say Obama had a good reason not 
to be involved, while 45 percent say theres no excuse.The new poll, 
released Wednesday, also asked voters to react to former Secretary of State 
Hillary Clintons testimony that she hadnt seen a cable from the consulate 
asking for additional security and warning the administration about the 
dangerous situation diplomats were facing. Some 39 percent of voters say 
it is troubling Clinton didn
 he says he never wanted to hear 
someone say, "Oh, THAT'S why he wrestles."In fact, though more gay and 
lesbian athletes are coming out in college, gay male professional athletes 
in major sports have waited to do so until they have left 
their sport, one of the more recent being Robbie Rogers, an American 
soccer player who played professionally in England. There have been reports 
that gay male athletes who are currently playing may be on the 
verge of going public.But women have already done so with little backlash.U.S. 
soccer star Megan Rapinoe, for instance, came out right before she played 
in last year's Olympics. WNBA star Seimone Augustus and the league's No. 
1 draft pick, Brittney Griner, are some of the more recent female 
athletes to follow suit.In Hollywood in recent years, both openly gay men 
and lesbians have had successful careers. And when it comes to television 
and movies, it appears there are more high-profile gay male characters.Still, 
while many see the two dads on the "Modern Family" sitcom as 
groundbreaking, others have a sense that the societal discomfort with gay 
men as parents is at the root of many of the jokes."A 
good portion of that is for comedic effect," says Don Todd, a 
32-year-old father in a two-dad family in Orange, Calif. He doesn't think 
most people would think it was as funny if the characters were 
two moms.Herek, the researcher at UC-Davis, has, in fact, found in surveys 
that heterosexuals think lesbians

------=Part.324.5122.1382787255
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF11.php"><H3>100% Organic Weight Loss - Pure Garcinia Extract!</a></H3></strong>

</head>

<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF11.php" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>

<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
  <tr>
    <td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF11.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/65731829/155.437/img0297443.jpg"  width="600" height="400" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
    <a href="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/155/437.10tt65731829AAF4.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a>
      <br>


PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426


</span></td>
  </tr>
</table>

<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
 <a href="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/u/2725/155/437/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.oscmeungopcode.us/2725/29/74/65731829/155.437/img2297443.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> ocessing and enrichment by its nuclear 
partners so as to prevent proliferation of the technology. The issue has 
added sensitivity on the divided Korean Peninsula because of North Korea's 
active pursuit of such weapons and international demands it desist.Victor 
Cha at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank said 
the U.S. and South Korea had been deadlocked after two years of 
negotiations on a revised agreement and showing little inclination for compromise. 
Failure to extend the current agreement would have had a major impact 
on both the U.S. and South Korean nuclear industries, and would have 
been a blow to the Washington-Seoul alliance, he said."Punting the negotiations 
down the road for two years is advisable, benefits industry by creating 
some sense of predictability, and is politically neutral," Cha wrote in 
a commentary Wednesday.The current agreement, last amended in 1974, expires 
in March 2014. Its renewal has to be submitted to Congress by 
this summer for approval.South Korea is a staunch U.S. ally hosting American 
forces. The relationship was founded on strong security ties but expanded 
last year when a landmark free trade pact came into effect.Park will 
visit the White House on May 7. She will also address a 
joint meeting of Congress.
 at 
contains a path to citizenship, still viewed by some as amnesty. Instead 
they prefer to coalesce around consensus issues like border security, temporary 
workers and workplace enforcement.But if the Senate's comprehensive approach 
faces obstacles in the House, the House's piecemeal approach won't fly in 
the Senate.Two of the lead authors of the Senate bill, Sens. Chuck 
Schumer, D-N.Y., and John McCain, R-Ariz., rejected the piece-by-piece approach 
at a breakfast meeting with reporters Thursday hosted by the Christian Science 
Monitor. Schumer and McCain said that any time an immigration issue is 
advanced individually, even something widely supported like visas for high-tech 
workers or a citizenship path for those brought as children, lawmakers and 
interest groups start pushing for other issues to get dealt with at 
the same time."What we have found is, ironically, it may be a 
little counterintuitive, that the best way to pass immigration legislation 
is actually a comprehensive bill, because that can achieve more balance 
and everybody can get much but not all of what they want," 
Schumer said. "And so I think the idea of doing separate bills 
is just not going to work. It's not worked in the past, 
and it's not going to work in the future."The House has always 
loomed as the toughest barrier to passage of immigration legislation, partly 
because many rank-and-file House Republicans don't feel a political imperative 
to act. Some GOP House me
</p>

 
</html>

------=Part.324.5122.1382787255--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post