[21338] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Alzheimer’s Conspiracy Exposed – One Old Trick You Need to Know
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cognizine)
Sun Nov 10 07:05:13 2013
Reply-To: <bounce-65731829@gorpfmfi.us>
From: "Cognizine" <Cognizine@gorpfmfi.us>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:05:11 -0800
To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.637.9689.1384085111
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Brain Doctors Hate Him...
http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/1393/2925.10tt65731829AAF7.php
Unsub- http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/1393/2925.10tt65731829AAF8.html
This April 18, 2011 file photo shows an air traffic controller working
in a terminal radar approach control room at the Atlanta TRACON in
Peachtree City, Ga.APAirline and pilot organizations have filed suit in
a bid to stop the Federal Aviation Administration from going through with
furloughs set to kick in this weekend, echoing the claims of congressional
Republicans that the agency could have found the savings elsewhere.The suit
comes after FAA Administrator Michael Huerta testified Thursday that the
public should expect flight delays as furloughs take effect Sunday for air
traffic controllers. He said FAA officials could find no other way to
cut $637 million from the agency's budget as required by the sequester.But
two airline trade associations and the Air Line Pilots Association said
Friday they have filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in Washington
to block the furloughs.The groups joined congressional Republicans in arguing
that the FAA was acting inappropriately. While the FAA announced Thursday
it was moving ahead with furloughs, the Transportation Security Administration
announced that it had found ways to avoid them.Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.,
said Thursday that the FAA "has made zero effort" to avoid the
furloughs."The FAA's decision is a dangerous political stunt that could
jeopardize the safety and security of air travelers," he said in a
statement. The FAA has estimated there could be flight delays of about
90 minutes du
The House has passed legislation aimed at helping businesses protect their
networks against sophisticated foreign hackers. But with a White House veto
threat and no clear path in the Senate, the bill -- and
the companies that support it -- are in limbo.Under the legislation, enterprises
and the federal government could share technical data without worrying about
anti-trust or classification laws. The bill also would grant businesses
legal immunity if hacked so long as they acted in good faith
to protect their networks.Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates fought
against the House measure because they say it would leave Americans vulnerable
to spying by military intelligence agencies. While not named in the bill,
the National Security Agency would likely take a central role in analyzing
threat data.
------=Part.637.9689.1384085111
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/1393/2925.10tt65731829AAF1.php"><H3>Brain Doctors Hate Him...</a></H3></strong>
<table width="600" border="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/1393/2925.10tt65731829AAF2.php"><img src="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/65731829/1393.2925/img017237643.jpg" width="629" height="532" border="0" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<table width="300" border="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td align="center" style="color: #666; font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/1393/2925.10tt65731829AAF3.html">Update Preferences</a><br><br>3225 Mc Leod Drive Suite #453, Las Vegas, NV 89121</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/u/2988/1393/2925/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.gorpfmfi.us/2988/172/376/65731829/1393.2925/img117237643.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">nment Accountability Office found
that although the number of mental health records available to the background
check system increased 800 percent since 2004, some states said they were
not sharing mental health information because of concerns about restrictions
under HIPAA privacy law. Obama is interested in a change that would
specifically allow disclosure of mental health records for the system, and
he wants to increase financial incentives for states to contribute the information.In
the Virginia Tech rampage, student Seung-Hui Cho shot 32 people to death
and committed suicide. He was able to buy two guns even though
he had been ruled a danger to himself during a court hearing
in 2005 and was ordered to undergo outpatient mental health treatment.Authorities
have not described a possible motive or released details of any mental
health condition that might explain why Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza killed
20 children and six adults before killing himself. The rifle he used
was purchased by his mother, whom he also killed at home before
heading to the school.The background check system does not give retailers
access to mental health records but simply tells them whether a buyer
is approved, denied or needs additional investigation before a firearm may
be purchased. The system doesn't tell the seller why a potential buyer
was denied.
Blocked by Congress from expanding gun sale background checks, President
Obama is turning to actions within his own power to keep people
from buying a gun who are prohibited for mental health reasons.Federal law
bans certain mentally ill people from purchasing firearms, but not all states
are providing data to stop the prohibited sales to the FBI's background
check system. A federal review last year found 17 states contributed fewer
than 10 mental health records to the database, meaning many deemed by
a judge to be a danger still could have access to guns.The
Obama administration was starting a process Friday aimed at removing barriers
in health privacy laws that prevent some states from reporting information
to the background check system. The action comes two days after the
Senate rejected a measure that would have required buyers of firearms online
and at gun shows to pass a background check. That's already required
for shoppers at licensed gun dealers.Stung by the defeat, Obama vowed to
keep up the fight for the background check expansion but also to
do what he could through executive action."Even without Congress, my administration
will keep doing everything it can to protect more of our communities,"
Obama said from the Rose Garden shortly after the Senate voted. "We're
going to address the barriers that prevent states from participating in
the existing background check system."Obama also mentioned giving law enforcement
more info
</p>
</html>
------=Part.637.9689.1384085111--
