[21949] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Vydox can get you the erection of your life! Check!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vydox)
Mon Nov 25 07:34:39 2013
To: mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:34:39 -0800
From: "Vydox" <Vydox@ketylxutemp.us>
Reply-To: <bounce-65731829@ketylxutemp.us>
------=Part.822.6756.1385382879
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Drive your partner crazy in bed tonight!
http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF17.php
Unsub- http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF10.html
Frustrated at being left out of an immigration overhaul, gay rights groups
are pushing to adjust a bipartisan Senate bill to include gay couples.
But Democrats are treading carefully, wary of adding another divisive issue
that could lose Republican support and jeopardize the entire bill.Both parties
want the bill to succeed. Merely getting to agreement on the basic
framework for the immigration overhaul, which would create a long and costly
path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million people in the U.S.
illegally, was no small feat for senators. And getting it through a
divided Congress is still far from a done deal.Even so, gay rights
groups, their lobbyists and grass-roots supporters are insisting the deal
shouldn't exclude bi-national, same-sex couples -- about 28,500 of them,
according to a 2011 study from the Williams Institute at UCLA Law.
They're ramping up a campaign to change the bill to allow gay
Americans to sponsor their partners for green cards, the same way straight
Americans can. Supporters trekked to the Capitol to make their case at
senators' offices on Wednesday."Opponents will be proposing amendments that,
if passed, could collapse this very fragile coalition that we've been able
to achieve," Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, said last week at
the unveiling of the bill. He said the eight senators from both
parties who crafted the legislation are committed to voting against changes
that could kill it.For Dem
and 1,600 rounds per officer,
while the U.S. Army goes through roughly 350 rounds per soldier.He noted
that is "roughly 1,000 rounds more per person.""Their officers use what
seems to be an exorbitant amount of ammunition," he said.Nick Nayak, chief
procurement officer for the Department of Homeland Security, did not challenge
Chaffetz's numbers.However, Nayak sought to counter what he described as
several misconceptions about the bullet buys.Despite reports that the department
was trying to buy up to 1.6 billion rounds over five years,
he said that is not true. He later clarified that the number
is closer to 750 million.He said the department, on average, buys roughly
100 million rounds per year.He also said claims that the department is
stockpiling ammo are "simply not true." Further, he countered claims that
the purchases are helping create broader ammunition shortages in the U.S.The
department has long said it needs the bullets for agents in training
and on duty, and buys in bulk to save money.While Democrats likened
concerns about the purchases to conspiracy theories, Republicans raised
concern about the sheer cost of the ammunition."This is not about conspiracy
theories, this is about good government," Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said.Rep.
Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the full Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, said he suspects rounds are being stockpiled, and then either
"disposed of," passed to non-federal agencies, o
------=Part.822.6756.1385382879
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF11.php"><H3>Drive your partner crazy in bed tonight!</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF11.php" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>
<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF11.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/65731829/1098.2340/img012625843.jpg" width="600" height="500" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
<a href="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/1098/2340.10tt65731829AAF4.html" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a><br>
<br>
Premium Nutraceuticals, LLC 4816 Technology Dr. Martinez, GA 30907
</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/u/3245/1098/2340/10/65731829/mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.ketylxutemp.us/3245/126/258/65731829/1098.2340/img212625843.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">eight years in the White House never would have been complete if
Leo Perino hadnt come for a visit. He insisted we turn the
other cheek and focus on the issue, never the personal. With forgiveness
came humility not gloating and allowing others to bask in a
political win. I felt like we never got to dance in the
end zone, but that that was the right thing to do. He
got to know his staff and how they did their best work
some needed chiding, others needed to be pushed, but I needed
reassurance. When hed call me to the Oval Office, hed say, And
tell her theres nothing wrong. He also knew I liked to be
told I was right. One day after a press conference, I said
that while I thought itd gone well, that one thing he said
would be taken out of context and be the headline. He disagreed.
A few hours later, I got a call in my office from
the residence. It was the president. He said, Hey, just wanted to
call and tell you that you were right. I said, Excuse me,
sir, could you repeat that? He did. And we laughed.Mrs. Barbara Bush
once told one of my Minute Mentoring events that when she talked
to her son about me and to me about her son that
Loyalty goes both ways. Indeed.I believe that leaders should inspire you
to be more like them. President Bush set a high bar and
I thank him for the opportunity he gave me. He was a
good president and is a good friend.Dana Perino is co-host of Fox
News Channel's " The Five" and a Fox News contributor. She
When he left the White House in January 2009 after two tumultuous
terms, President George W. Bush -- the only man to attain the
presidency by virtue of a Supreme Court ruling and only the second
son of a president to also serve as president -- was nursing
an approval rating around 30 percent.Four years later, however, public opinion
has turned slowly but steadily in the former presidents direction. A nationwide
Fox News poll conducted earlier this week now finds registered voters evenly
split in their assessments of the 43rd president -- a verdict roughly
equal to the esteem in which they hold his successor, President Obama.As
Bush prepares to attend the dedication of his presidential library in Dallas,
Texas, on Thursday, his increasing approval generally mirrors the trend
for other former presidents, but Bush's turnaround is remarkable, given
how low the numbers were when he left office. At his lowest,
amid the dark days of the financial collapse in October 2008, only
23 percent rated Bush positively.Throughout President Obamas first term
-- when the incumbent relentlessly blamed his predecessor for the state
of the economy and a host of national security problems -- Bush,
aside from promoting his 2010 memoir and giving a small number of
paid speeches, mostly remained silent. This was in keeping with the practice
of his father, George H.W. Bush, of never criticizing his successor, and
it may partially explain the rise in esteem for th
</p>
</html>
------=Part.822.6756.1385382879--
