[24770] in Kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: gss_acquire_cred() failed:

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nikhil Mulley)
Fri Sep 30 02:01:18 2005

Message-ID: <1e7c46190509292300o3175f3i48b6adb15a1d71db@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:30:37 +0530
From: Nikhil Mulley <mnikhil@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F01366A9396752F7D1E46EBE@bistromath.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Reply-To: Nikhil Mulley <mnikhil@gmail.com>
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I humbly acknowledge what you said and apologize for the same..


On 9/28/05, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2005 05:38:14 PM +0530 Nikhil Mulley
> <mnikhil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > can some one please respond..
>
> This is a mailing list, not an IRC chat room.
> You sent your initial message at 9:45 PM Pacific time, which is after
> midnight on the US east coast, and early morning in Europe. None of the
> experts were awake.
>
> Your next message came a few hours later, still in the middle of the
> night.
>
> Your third message came a couple of hours after that.
>
>
>
> It is entirely unreasonable to expect that in the space of a few hours,
> overnight, someone who recognizes your problem will read and respond. It's
> also unreasonable, in my opinion, to ever repeatedly ask the same question
> or ask "someone please respond" on a public mailing list. If someone had
> read your message who knew the answer to your question, they would have
> responded.
>
>
>


--
Nikhil

Google is Great !
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post