[24787] in Kerberos
Re: Is this a bug?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeremy Hunt)
Mon Oct 3 14:57:57 2005
Message-Id: <30548228.1128311526990.JavaMail.root@optim1>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:52:02 +1000
From: Jeremy Hunt <jeremyh@optimation.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <24008846.1128310579272.JavaMail.root@optim1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Ken Raeburn wrote:
>[safeTgram (optim1) receive status: NOT encrypted, NOT signed.]
>
>
>On Sep 30, 2005, at 02:44, Jeremy Hunt wrote:
>
>
>>This seems harmless enough, however further investigation shows
>>that k5-int.h has this definition for struct _krb5_donot_replay:
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>and krb5-hin (which generates krb5.in after make) has this definition:
>>
>>
>
>Not in the version in the 1.4.2 tarball I just grabbed from our web
>site. Nor in the initial 1.4 release I just checked out from CVS.
>(This change was made between the 1.3 series and 1.4.) Please re-
>check where you got those sources from.
>
>
You are absolutely right Ken, I had an old version of this file. Thank
you for putting me right, and sorry I had not picked it up before
asking. I did think I had checked that possibility beforehand.
I guess I should re-check all files before I attempt to rebuild again.
>Ken
>
>
>
>
Cheers,
Jeremy
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
