|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <43BB163C.90605@v.loewis.de> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:26:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?= <martin@v.loewis.de> To: kerberos@mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu Douglas E. Engert wrote: > This sounds like IE and sspi are using referrals: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-06.txt I see. I now think I understand what's happening: A.B.COM and B.COM are distinct forests. So B.COM will not issue domain referrals for A.B.COM, unless there is a forest trust (which there isn't either; neither domain is on the Windows 2003 forest functional level). Thanks everybody for the help. Regards, Martin ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |