[2629] in Kerberos
Re: Solaris 2.1 Kerberos
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael T. Stolarchuk)
Thu Mar 18 15:42:14 1993
To: eichin@Athena.MIT.EDU ("Mark W. Eichin")
Cc: jec@uunet.uu.net, cwm@lanl.gov, kerberos@Athena.MIT.EDU,
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Mar 93 12:33:47 EST."
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 93 15:23:09 -0500
From: "Michael T. Stolarchuk" <mts@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
>> >> I'd like to know if the protocol has support for encryption as
>> >>well. (If so, that's a major advantage of AFS :-)
>> Apologies -- I meant, "That would be a major advantage *over*
>> AFS".
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you want every byte in
the RX packets encrypted (cause that can be done), or are
you saying that AFS doesn't secure the established connection?
mts.
