[27513] in Kerberos
Re: What version next?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Thu Mar 1 12:52:53 2007
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:52:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87lkih1b3m.fsf@pumba.bayour.com> (Turbo Fredriksson's message of
"Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:01:33 +0100")
Message-ID: <tsl649kdf6m.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
I'd definitely start testing 1.6 on clients and servers. I think 1.6
is much more stable than 1.5, and I believe that enough has chnaged
that you'll want to see if there are going to be any difficult
migration issues while you have time.
Deploying 1.6 clients is a good idea because the referrals support in
1.6 will eventually be useful to you. It's client side only right
now, but that allows you to get the clients out.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
