[27521] in Kerberos
Re: What version next?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Turbo Fredriksson)
Fri Mar 2 10:42:27 2007
To: kerberos@mit.edu
From: Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:41:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <590C413E-FC21-47E6-8ED6-ED5210836D43@mit.edu> (Ken Raeburn's
message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:59:26 -0500")
Message-ID: <87hct3y7nf.fsf@pumba.bayour.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Quoting Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>:
> including preauthentication and KDC location determination
What does this mean/do?
> Client-side support for server name referrals,
> if you're using a Microsoft KDC. SPNEGO support in GSSAPI.
Is this going to make it easier (in exactly what way) to use
a MIT Kerberos V KDC as a (almost?) native Kerberos server/KDC?
> (Want to write support for another database back end?)
You wish :). Nah, I'm quite happy with the current backend.
It's proven to be the most stable and easy to use/replicate...
> Security patches and many other bug fixes...
How long until it's considerd production quality? Is it
there already?
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
