[28667] in Kerberos
Re: Now with PAM? Solaris 10 sshd and ticket forwarding
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicolas Williams)
Mon Nov 5 16:38:25 2007
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:37:48 -0600
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Jeff Blaine <jblaine@kickflop.net>
Message-ID: <20071105213747.GL11498@Sun.COM>
Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Blaine <jblaine@kickflop.net>,
"Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov>, kerberos@mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <472F87AD.9040200@kickflop.net>
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu, "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:14:21PM -0500, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Very likely. One heads down roads like these and
> the default 'other' stack are the last things to
> consider (for me at least).
If we shipped a default PAM configuration for every application then
modifying the "other" one wouldn't be a way to shoot yourself in the
foot. But then you'd have to do that much more editing of pam.conf...
Nico
--
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
