[29368] in Kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

MIT or HEIMDAL ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bonnet)
Tue Feb 26 11:21:56 2008

Message-ID: <47C3DBE9.8080509@esiee.fr>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:29:13 +0100
From: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu

Hello

I suppose this have been discussed numerous times ... but I'm starting
a Kerberos deploy here and I really would like some advices ...

We have a mixed clients network with approx 1000 machines
running Windows 2000 / XP and Linux ( Debian ) , my kerberos
server is a HP DL380 Proliant with 2.5 Gb RAM running FreeBSD 6.3-R.

Due to my inexperience I'm really not able to decide which version to
choose ... MIT or HEIMDAL ?

HEIMDAL is the standard version on FreeBSD but MIT is available from
the officials ports so ...

Any guru that could give me some advices ?

Thanks a lot
Frank

________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post