[31659] in Kerberos
Re: Assertion failed for krb5kdc
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Shaw)
Sun Nov 8 23:36:05 2009
From: Tom Shaw <tomisfaraway@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <434c8970-2027-42d4-9c26-9e739af688a1@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Oct 20, 8:46 am, Ken Raeburn <raeb...@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2009, at 16:55, eightball wrote:
>
> >> This would be dependent on some configuration macros,
> >> HAVE_PRAGMA_WEAK_REF and NO_WEAK_PTHREADS; can you see which are set
> >> in include/autoconf.h in the build tree? The former should be
> >> defined
> >> (based on tests of the compiler, so it may also depend on which
> >> compiler you're using), and the latter should not (selected in the
> >> configure script based on the OS version).
>
> >> Ken
>
> > Both are set to 1.
>
> Okay, that sounds like it's the problem. The configure script should
> be setting the latter only for Solaris 10, unless the patterns we're
> checking for are wrong:
> [...]
> solaris2.[1-9])
> [...]
I hadthe same problem on Solaris 9. I just downloaded the latest
krb5-1.7-signed.tar (http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/krb5/1.7/
krb5-1.7-signed.tar) and the configure script is not quite the same as
you have listed.
Instead of:
solaris2.[1-9])
the configure script has:
solaris2.1-9)
Changing the configure script to your version (with the square
brackets), and re-building fixed the problem.
Regards
Tom
--
Tom Shaw
Solid Systems Australia
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
