[1698] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Propsal: Add krb5_get_profile...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Horowitz)
Sun Sep 1 17:57:52 1996
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, epeisach@MIT.EDU, krbcore@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "01 Sep 1996 07:29:09 EDT."
<tslk9ueh3sq.fsf@tertius.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 1996 17:57:42 EDT
From: Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>
In message <tslk9ueh3sq.fsf@tertius.mit.edu>, Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU> writes:
>> I think that encryption and forwarding and other
>> Kerberos-related options may still be an exception to this. It is
>> often desirable to set a site-s encryption/forwarding policy in one
>> place even if there are application-specific exceptions.
This may be true, but we should think this through very carefully. I
think some of the proposals I saw go over the kerberos list were
substantial overkill.
Perhaps we should defer this mostly non-technical issue until
post-beta7.
Marc
