[1745] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Alpha
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Mon Sep 9 17:30:22 1996
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>, krbdev@MIT.EDU
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: 09 Sep 1996 17:30:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o"'s message of Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:24:37 -0400
>>>>> ""Theodore" == "Theodore Y Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:
"Theodore> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 03:48:28 -0400 From: Sam
"Theodore> Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
"Theodore> On another note, I assume you have tested kprop/kpropd
"Theodore> since the converstion to using kdb5_util, correct? How
"Theodore> high is your confidence level with those programs?
As high as it is with V4. I tend to think they are a crock
and avoid using them when possible. In my environment, the slave KDC
has to trust the host principal of the master to login for other
reasons, so once I got kpropd working, I switched to using rcp --x to
move over the dump.
--Sam
"Theodore> - Ted
