[1763] in Kerberos_V5_Development
krbdev vs krbcore
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Fri Sep 20 02:22:40 1996
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 02:22:24 -0400
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
To: krbdev@MIT.EDU
Since I have not seen a policy for the use of krbdev vs
krbcore, I would like to state the implicit policy I have assumed and
seek confirmation on its reasonableness.
I assume the krbdev mailing list is semi-public, and while not
well-announced, may contain members who are not part of the MIT
Kerberos team. The krbcore group.list implies write access to the
source tree and is only for the Kerberos team. Both mailing lists
are archived to a public discuss meeting.
I assume that krbdev should be used for
announcements/discussion that do not have an implicit requirement for
privacy. However, things like release deadlines, security bugs, etc,
should be discussed on krbcore or through personal mail.
--Sam
