[1802] in Kerberos_V5_Development
krb5-admin/34: need way to extract v4 srvtabs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tlyu@MIT.EDU)
Thu Sep 26 20:04:09 1996
Resent-From: gnats@rt-11.MIT.EDU (GNATS Management)
Resent-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Resent-Reply-To: krb5-bugs@dragons-lair.mit.edu, tlyu@MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 20:02:57 -0400
From: tlyu@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: tlyu@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
>Number: 34
>Category: krb5-admin
>Synopsis: need way to extract v4 srvtabs
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: bjaspan
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Sep e 20:04:01 EDT 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Tom Yu
>Organization:
mit
>Release: unknown-1.0
>Environment:
System: SunOS tesla-coil 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc
>Description:
From: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 17:06:36 -0400
To: krbcore@MIT.EDU
Subject: New kadmin and v4 keys....
I noted that it is no longer possible to extract a v4 srvtab using
kadmin... Was this intentional?
Ezra
To: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Cc: krbcore@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: New kadmin and v4 keys....
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: 27 Jul 1996 19:21:24 -0400
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
>>>>> "epeisach" == epeisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU> writes:
epeisach> I noted that it is no longer possible to extract a v4
epeisach> srvtab using kadmin... Was this intentional?
I don't know, but you can get the same functionality by
converting the srvtab using ktutil. In other words, I could see a
good argument for not adding additional complexity to the new kadmind,
particularly if we get the kadmind.v4 working.
--Sam
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 96 16:02:37 -0400
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Cc: krbcore@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: New kadmin and v4 keys....
I noted that it is no longer possible to extract a v4 srvtab using
kadmin... Was this intentional?
What Sam said is correct. Either use ktutil, or we can merge ktutil
into the kadmin client. I'd prefer not to put the xtra baggage into
kadmin, but really it does not matter much and may be simpler overall.
Barry
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 22:33:24 -0400
Message-Id: <9608080233.AA08627@dcl.MIT.EDU>
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
Cc: epeisach@MIT.EDU, krbcore@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: New kadmin and v4 keys....
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 96 16:02:37 -0400
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
What Sam said is correct. Either use ktutil, or we can merge ktutil
into the kadmin client. I'd prefer not to put the xtra baggage into
kadmin, but really it does not matter much and may be simpler
overall.
Well, we do need a convenient way for administrators to create V4
srvtabs. Perhaps the right answer is a shell script that calls kadmin
and ktutil, but we still need something like this....
- Ted
