[1823] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: make vs. gmake and the Athena source tree
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Horowitz)
Mon Sep 30 04:08:45 1996
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Cc: krbdev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Sep 1996 16:53:01 EDT."
<199609292053.QAA01801@the-light-fantastic.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 02:44:39 EDT
From: Marc Horowitz <marc@MIT.EDU>
In message <199609292053.QAA01801@the-light-fantastic.MIT.EDU>, Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>> So, let me address the reasons to use gmake that I've heard of:
You forgot the biggest one in my book: with basic make, I have yet to
see an implementation or even a proposal for simultaneously generating
multiple types of libraries (static, profiled, shared), which is both
"portable" and not unmaintainably obtuse.
Marc
