[1881] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: On libdb and shared libraries....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Y. Ts'o)
Mon Oct 28 13:54:08 1996
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 13:53:43 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>, krbdev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Ezra Peisach's message of Sun, 27 Oct 1996 17:49:37 EST,
<9610272249.AA13173@kangaroo.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 17:49:37 EST
From: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
Does anyone know of a reason why I should not explicitly link
in the necessary libraries - either $(TOPLIBD)/libkrb5.a or $(TOPLIBD)/libkrb5.so? Will this break any platforms
that people know of?
It's the right solution; I can't think of any platforms that doing an
explicit link will break. I think the reason why no one has done this
up until now is because of the complexity associated with issue of how
shared libraries are named on different platforms. This shouldn't be an
impossible problem to solve, though.
- Ted
