[19751] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: LMDB KDB module design notes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Bartlett)
Thu Apr 12 15:04:28 2018
Message-ID: <1523559840.164440.147.camel@samba.org>
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>,
krbdev@mit.edu
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 07:04:00 +1200
In-Reply-To: <1523534607.10955.37.camel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 08:03 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I am not a fan of setups that use multiple files for databases, especially when
> transactions need to span multiple ones.
> What is the underlying reason to do this in the new design instead of using a
> single database file with all the data ?
I just lurk here, but I have to agree with Simo here from Samba
experience. Be very careful about lock ordering between multiple
databases.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
