[20367] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: LDFLAGS in krb5-config --libs, but not in pkg-config
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken Hornstein via krbdev)
Mon May 2 16:13:02 2022
Message-ID: <202205022011.242KBbAV013997@hedwig.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
cc: krbdev@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <021888ad-1c54-d10b-fb4a-0b46576fa153@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 16:11:37 -0400
From: Ken Hornstein via krbdev <krbdev@mit.edu>
Reply-To: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
>So we could omit LDFLAGS (substitute it with nothing, like we do for
>CFLAGS already) while keeping the rpath options generated by the build
>machinery.
That sounds fine to me.
BTW, I am now remembering why I wasn't so crazy about pkg-config; for
MIT Kerberos at least there are no rpath options that made it into
the pkgconfig file. And it's not clear to me from a quick Google
what the general consensus is in terms of handling rpath options
for pkgconfig files.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
