[1030] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Shostack)
Fri Jun 20 12:33:18 1997
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
In-Reply-To: <199706191922.MAA04110@blacklodge.c2.net> from Peter Trei at "Jun 19, 97 03:22:46 pm"
To: trei@process.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 07:56:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
I plan to spend a substaintial portion of my day explaining to the
large companies I consult with that this is a very bad thing, and they
should be opposing its advance.
I intend to take the 11 cryptographers paper as my primary tack, and
am wondering if anyone has any other good "upper management" type
arguments that I should use.
Adam
Peter Trei wrote:
| New crypto bill clears committee
| By Alex Lash
| June 19, 1997, 11 a.m. PT
|
| just in Just two days after it was introduced, a bill that seeks
| to impose restrictions on the domestic use of encryption sailed
| without hearings through the Senate Commerce Committee.
