[10345] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cringely Gives KnowNow Some Unbelievable Free Press... (fwd)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jamesd@echeque.com)
Fri Feb 1 13:36:37 2002

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Cryptography List <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>,
	Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:38:28 -0800
Message-ID: <3C58F474.19753.9B540@localhost>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0201272117220.13380-100000@sun3.lrz-muenchen.de>

    --
On 27 Jan 2002, at 21:17, Eugene Leitl wrote:
> I think the only patents of particular note for ECC are
> Certicom and H.P.'s ones on point-compression.

The original paper on ECC proposed point compression and
described the algorithm in 1985.

See Bernstein's web page
http://cr.yp.to/nistp224/patents.html

Use the 1985 method.

If the methods patented are the same, and as far as I can
tell they are, the patents are invalid.  If the methods
patented differ, you are not using them.

 

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     V2lKe8/zPipRJIcZE97A49gog89BMHmZrKWJ0GA8
     4sl5ZBNjSI2/m083cg2ed9OSfY9/uWraeiBqyR+Dj




---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post