[1054] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kent Crispin)
Sat Jun 21 18:58:27 1997
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 15:07:08 -0700
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
On Sat, Jun 21, 1997 at 05:21:25PM -0400, Marc Horowitz wrote:
> Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
>
> >> You have to distinguish between GAK and CACK (Corporate Access to
> >> Corporate Keys). Many people believe there is a good case for the
> >> latter, but not the former. In fact, the "11 cryptographers" paper
> >> says this.
>
> There is a case for CACK for stored data, but not communications.
I agree with this completely.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
