[10797] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Government subsidies: our last, best hope for Cryptoanarchy?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Enzo Michelangeli)
Sat May 25 12:31:03 2002
Reply-To: "Enzo Michelangeli" <em@em.no-ip.com>
From: "Enzo Michelangeli" <em@who.net>
To: <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 07:57:42 +0800
> Status: U
> From: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
> To: <cypherpunks@lne.com>
> Subject: Government subsidies: our last, best hope for Cryptanarchy?
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 01:44:53 -0700
> Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com
>
[...]
> The same Cypherpunk expressed a hope that absent NAI's PGP, the German
> government group currently funding GPG might be more inclined to fund UI
> work for Windows. Perhaps they would. Assuming for a moment they will,
> would this lead to a better PGP Windows UI than NAI's PGP offered? NAI's
> PGP UI is pretty darn good. Looking at the sorry state of UI's currently
> offered for GPG, even with government funding, I suspect that it will be
> a long time indeed before we will see a GPG UI that will compare
> positively to the current NAI PGP UI.
This may not be very relevant to the rest of the article, but: what's
wrong with WinPT (www.winpt.org)? It looks quite good to me, and very close
in look and feel to NAI PGP UI.
Enzo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
