[10812] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FC: Hollywood wants to plug "analog hole," regulate A-D conve

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hughes, James P)
Wed May 29 16:52:13 2002

From: "Hughes, James P" <HugheJP@LOUISVILLE.STORTEK.COM>
To: "'ptrei@rsasecurity.com'" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>,
	"'Michael_Heyman@NAI.com'" <Michael_Heyman@NAI.com>,
	"'cryptography@wasabisystems.com'" <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:33:51 -0600

Change the billboard for elevator music (which will be protected). Will you
be able to play back your digital dictations *if* they were recorded in an
environment that included background music.

IMHO, Silly does not mean they will not be successful. Look at DMCA.  





-----Original Message-----
From: Trei, Peter <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>
To: 'Michael_Heyman@NAI.com' <Michael_Heyman@NAI.com>;
'cryptography@wasabisystems.com' <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Sent: Wed May 29 12:29:39 2002
Subject: RE: FC: Hollywood wants to plug "analog hole," regulate A-D conve
rters

Actually, it's unlikely that anyone would embed watermarks in billboard
ads, or in ads in general. Copying an ad is usually a Good Thing from
the advertiser's point of view - more exposure. It's only the program
material which needs protection.

To get back to security; could I use this to defeat video surrveilliance
cameras, by wearing a copyrighted teeshirt??

This thread on this very silly idea from the MPAA has gone far 
enough, IMHO. 

Peter Trei

> ----------
> From: 	Michael_Heyman@NAI.com[SMTP:Michael_Heyman@NAI.com]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, May 29, 2002 2:14 PM
> To: 	cryptography@wasabisystems.com
> Subject: 	RE: FC: Hollywood wants to plug "analog hole," regulate A-D
> conve rters
> 
> > From: Pete Chown [mailto:Pete.Chown@skygate.co.uk]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 8:05 AM
> > 
> > David G. Koontz wrote:
> > 
> > > Can you imagine watermarks on billboard advertisements?  How
> > > subliminal.
> > 
> > Actually this would be weird.  Suppose digital cameras had to
> > be fitted with a watermark detection system.  Suddenly, we 
> > have lost a much more fundamental fair use right -- the right 
> > to include copyright material as an incidental part of a photograph.
> > [SNIP]
> >
> I would like to buy some watermarked cloths please. Then I could be
> invisible :-)
> 
> -Michael Heyman
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Cryptography Mailing List
> Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to
> majordomo@wasabisystems.com
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to
majordomo@wasabisystems.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post