[10902] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ji@research.att.com)
Fri Jun 21 11:16:33 2002

Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: ji@research.att.com
To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com

Under this proposed law, will ISPs have to scan *all* SMTP traffic and
record the envelope, or only the traffic for which they actually do 
SMTP forwarding?  If the latter is the case, we can simply go back to
the original end-to-end SMTP delivery model; no POP/IMAP or any of
that stuff.  If the former is the case, well, so long as they don't
outlaw crypto, ISPs can't sniff SMTP going over IPsec, now, can they?

Of course, outlawing crypto or declaring that anyone who terminates an
SMTP connection, including end-users, is considered an ISP for the
purposes of the law solves their problem.

/ji


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post