[11045] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: MS DRMOS Palladium -- The Trojan Horse OS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark S. Miller)
Thu Jul 4 14:11:08 2002

Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 10:39:57 -0700
To: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@rsasecurity.com>
From: "Mark S. Miller" <markm@caplet.com>
Cc: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
In-Reply-To: <3D232982.7040408@rsasecurity.com>

At 09:42 AM 7/3/2002 Wednesday, Marc Branchaud wrote:
>By patenting the DRMOS, only M$ will be allowed to create such a beast (OK, 
>they could license the patent without restrictions -- pardon me while I pick 
>myself up off the floor).  This means that the rest of the planet's OSes 
>will have nothing even approaching DRM functionality, because nobody wants 
>to be sued by M$.
>
>That's good, but OTOH other OSes will not build anything approaching secure 
>computing either, for the same reason.

That seems like a complete non-sequitur.  Why won't others build secure 
OSes?  MS didn't patent security (not that I've heard anyway).  For example, 
how is EROS http://www.eros-os.org threatened by these MS patents?


----------------------------------------
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

        Cheers,
        --MarkM


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post