[11743] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Sun donates elliptic curve code to OpenSSL?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Noriyuki Soda)
Tue Sep 24 11:59:12 2002
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:58:12 +0900 (JST)
From: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@parrhesia.com>
Cc: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>, cryptography@wasabisystems.com
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020924082836.0442a8e0@bivens.parrhesia.com>
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:32:30 -0700,
Greg Broiles <gbroiles@parrhesia.com> said:
> Do you have an alternate explanation for the terms of Sun's license?
The 3 terms may be considered as:
This reciprocal covenant only affects the code which
is contributed by Sun this time.
Otherwise, the term 3) ii) doesn't make sense.
>>> (2) don't modify Sun's code as provided by Sun, don't use only parts
>>> of the donated code, and don't remove the license text from the
>>> code.
The above claim about "don't modify Sun's code" is based on the
following term, right?
3) for infringements caused by:
i) the modification of the Contribution or
ii) the combination of the Contribution with other
software or devices where such combination causes
the infringement.
But if one cannot combine the contributed code with other software,
this contributed code doesn't make any sense.
Note this is library code, and the only way to use such function is to
combine it with other software.
--
soda
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
