| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301151600530.5207-100000@greeves.mfn.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:25:27 -0800 To: Alif The Terrible <measl@mfn.org> From: Jon Simon <jon@jonsimon.com> Cc: cryptography@wasabisystems.com It's a reality check. Despite a massive amount of work to make computer networks secure, remote attacks are often successful (for many reasons of course, including non-technical ones like poorly chosen passwords, but technical ones as well), and now we're talking about securing something the hacker has physical access to. I seriously doubt any new DRM system will be totally secure in hardware or software at v5.0, let alone v1.0. So why worry? Some companies are just banding together to do something they've never been able to do, definitely won't be able to do well on the first release, and likely won't be able to do successfully for a long time if ever. -Jon At 4:01 PM -0600 1/15/03, Alif The Terrible wrote: >A C-Minus on the Troll-O-Meter... > >On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Jon Simon wrote: > >> I'm not worried about DRM. Though I do not at all like the idea of >> having someone else 0wn my machine, especially someone like >> Microsoft, I have faith that the first several versions will be >> relatively easily defeated by wily hacker types. After that, armed >> with a machine with DRM but that I 0wn, it doesn't really matter >> anymore to me, right? >> -Jon Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |