[12421] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: EU Privacy Authorities Seek Changes in Microsoft 'Passport'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lucky Green)
Tue Jan 28 12:22:11 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
To: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "'bear'" <bear@sonic.net>
Cc: "'R. A. Hettinga'" <rah@shipwright.com>,
"'Digital Bearer Settlement List'" <dbs@philodox.com>,
<cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:45:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3E3574DB.2090108@datapower.com>
Rich Salz wrote:
> Liberty is architected to be federated, unlike Passport.
The Liberty Alliance was stillborn to begin with. Not that it made any
practical difference, but the Liberty Alliance received an additional
bullet through the head the day that RSA Security, a key participant in
the Liberty Alliance, announced that they would also support Microsoft
Passport.
--Lucky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
