[12472] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Columbia crypto box

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Fields)
Sat Feb 8 13:37:35 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:36:46 -0500
From: Adam Fields <fields@surgam.net>
To: Tim Dierks <tim@dierks.org>
Cc: "John S. Denker" <jsd@monmouth.com>,
	cryptography@wasabisystems.com
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030208131439.03715038@dierks.org>

On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:24:14PM -0500, Tim Dierks wrote:
> There may be more valid reasons for treating the device as secret; some 
> categories that come to mind include protecting non-cryptographic 
> information, such as the capabilities of the communication channel. Also, 
> many systems on the shuttle are obsolete by modern standards, and it's 
> possible that the communications security is similarly aged.

Isn't it also possible that the device contains a physical key of some
kind?

-- 
				- Adam

-----
Adam Fields, Managing Partner, fields@surgam.net
Surgam, Inc. is a technology consulting firm with strong background in
delivering scalable and robust enterprise web and IT applications.
http://www.adamfields.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post