[12643] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Scientists question electronic voting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anton Stiglic)
Thu Mar 6 12:24:29 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: "Anton Stiglic" <astiglic@okiok.com>
To: "Ed Gerck" <egerck@nma.com>, <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>,
"Bill Frantz" <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:52:50 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Frantz" <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: "Ed Gerck" <egerck@nma.com>; <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: Scientists question electronic voting
[..]
> The best counter to this problem is widely available systems to produce
> fake photos of the vote, so the vote buyer can't know whether the votes he
> sees in the photo are the real votes, or fake ones.
>
> The easiest way to implement is to let people photograph the paper on the
> sample/practice -- not for real voting -- machine that poll workers use to
> teach voters how to use the real machines.
An extortionist could provide their own camera device to the voter, which
has
a built in clock that timestamps the photos and does some watermarking, or
something like that, which could complicate the counter-measures. But this
problem already exists with current non-electronic voting scheme.
It depends on the value attributed to a vote (would an extortionist be
willing to provide these custom devices?).
--Anton
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
