[13076] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DRM technology and policy

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John S. Denker)
Tue Apr 22 14:45:41 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:23:25 -0400
From: "John S. Denker" <jsd@monmouth.com>
To: Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org>, cryptography@metzdowd.com,
	Peter Clay <pete@flatline.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <87he8qzpbc.fsf@meo-dipt.andreas.org>

On 04/22/2003 08:31 AM, Andreas Bogk wrote in part:
> 
> Making a copy of something is no longer a
> scarce resource.  DRM is nothing but a try to keep it scarce for a
> little longer.


On 04/22/2003 09:06 AM, Peter Clay wrote in part:
 >
 >  I'm sure that if candy
 > could be produced with zero _marginal_ cost, there would be free candy
 > stores.


Please get a clue.  Copyright isn't about the
scarcity of copying or the marginal cost thereof.
Never has been.

Copyright is about recouping the _fixed_ costs.  This
is necessary in general, and particularly important
when the market is of limited size, so that the fixed
cost per unit is significant in absolute terms.

http://www.copyrighthistory.com/anne.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section8


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post