[13311] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Payments as an answer to spam

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anne & Lynn Wheeler)
Sat May 17 18:44:54 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 08:07:35 -0600
To: "Anton Stiglic" <astiglic@okiok.com>
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Cc: <iang@systemics.com>, <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <007201c31af3$2a7c7340$3b00a8c0@p1038mobile>

At 11:03 AM 5/15/2003 -0400, Anton Stiglic wrote:
>PODS using something =E0 la PGP would not
>imply PKI, but still a centralized server
>as you said.
>Payment systems don't need a PKI, but
>a centralized server as you said, and
>also needs some kind of financial
>institution to bootstrap things (which is easier
>to do in a closed system, than in an open
>system like the Internet).


x9.59 standard for all elecronic payments can use digital signatures w/o=20
PKI or certificates ... just public key registered with account and=20
connectivity to senders financial institution. It isn't "centralized" any=20
more than the existing payment card operation is centralized .... aka huge=
=20
number of different consumer financial institutions all with their=20
individual operation and account records. however, much of it is based on a=
=20
private network interconnecting all of these financial operations that=20
predates the existing internet ... but effectively functionally equivalent.

The existing payment card infrastructures are open in the sense thay they=20
do have an international standard, iso8583 .... in much the same way that=20
certificates have iso international standard. and there are numerous=20
interconnects between the internet and these infrastructure ... witness the=
=20
existing electronic commerce. It is less open than the "internet" in the=20
sense that there are contractual, institutional, and financial obligations=
=20
that are necessary to directly participate (but i believe that will tend to=
=20
be always true except in the cases of toy demos). However, that isn't=20
precluding the migration of more electronic commerce related traffic to=20
internet-based technology in various ways. The issue isn't directly whether=
=20
it is internet-related technology or non-internet related technology ....=20
but much more of an issue whether there are explicit legal and other=20
obligations required to participate.

x9.59 standard reference
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#x9.59
account record public key infrastructures
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#aads




--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler    http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
 =20



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post