[14472] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Simple SSL/TLS - Some Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roy M. Silvernail)
Fri Oct 3 15:03:43 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <3F7DB88C.B2C5A269@systemics.com> from "Ian Grigg" at Oct 03, 2003 01:57:32 PM
From: roy@rant-central.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
iang wrote:
>
> Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > It's worth summing up the design goals here, so nobody gets confused.
> > Trouble is, I haven't figured out what they should all be. The main
> > point of confusion/contention right now seem to be (1) should it be in C
> > or C++?,
>
> C. And write C++ wrappers or let someone else do it.
Yes! Speaking from experience, it's far easier to write a C++ wrapper
for a C lib than the other way around. And as Ian said, it's probably
easier to get the implementation correct in C, at least as a first pass.
--
Roy M. Silvernail is roy@rant-central.com, and you're not
http://www.rant-central.com is the new scytale
Never Forget: It's Only 1's and 0's!
SpamAssassin->procmail->/dev/null->bliss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
